Late Roman Bronze Coins

Late Roman Bronze Forum

News:

contact email  victors@vcoins.com

Recent posts

#1
Resources / Re: Two new books on London co...
Last post by Victor - Today at 02:18:06 PM
The new RIC V.5 is a chore to use. Variations that may have been better suited as footnotes are given a RIC number.

This Maximianus coin used to be London 34; but now it has different numbers according to the sceptre.

a vertical scepter is RIC V.5 London 3607

vertical_3607.jpg



and a transverse sceptre is RIC V.5 London 3610

Transverse_3610.jpg



and the Allectus galley type has over a dozen different entries according to mast or no mast, waves or no waves, how many rowers etc.

RIC V.5 London 276 (maybe)

Allectus_London_55.jpg
#2
COTD / Re: Constantius II campgate fr...
Last post by Victor - April 28, 2025, 10:09:29 PM
Quote from: six2ten on April 28, 2025, 05:27:31 PMSo you won the bidding war then?  :)

Yes...and I quess that I am happy  :-\


It is a superb example though and I really wanted it for my campgate collection. The last example I had was, in dealer talk, "collector grade" (when you just have to have an example) and I eventually sold it.

#3
COTD / Re: Constantius II campgate fr...
Last post by six2ten - April 28, 2025, 05:27:31 PM
So you won the bidding war then?  :)
#4
COTD / Constantius II campgate from S...
Last post by Victor - April 28, 2025, 08:53:45 AM
If you want to get a campgate from Sirmium it has to be Constantius II. Constantine I had SARMATIA DEVICTA and Crispus and Constantine II had ALAMANNIA DEVICTA. So Constantius alone appeared on the campgates.

Constantius_Sirmium_53.jpg


Constantius II
A.D. 324- 325
Ӕ nummus    18mm    3.3g
FL IVL CONSTANTIVS NOB C; Laureate, draped and cuirassed bust left.
PROVIDENTIAE CAESS; campgate with two turrets and ✶ between them.
in ex. SIRM
RIC VII Sirmium 53


https://constantinethegreatcoins.com/campgates/

#5
COTD / Re: Magnentius RENOBATIO VRBIS...
Last post by Joshmaggosh - April 27, 2025, 04:56:46 PM
It seems like this seller was selling off a hoard that was slabbed. The coins had the same patina/encrustations and most were from around or just after the revolt of Nepotian. ...in fact one of the coins was a Nepotianus that sold for $575. I considered dropping a bid on it. It had a really nice obverse but the reverse was pretty rough. Here's the coin I bought from the bunch.
#6
COTD / Re: Magnentius RENOBATIO VRBIS...
Last post by Victor - April 27, 2025, 12:59:17 PM

attachments are working after the update

#7
COTD / Magnentius from Arles with leg...
Last post by Victor - April 26, 2025, 01:52:30 PM
This one is pretty rough; but it is also pretty rare. I am guesstimating about the RIC number as [humor on] I can't make heads or tails out of the obverse.[humor off]  ::)


Magnentius Arles.jpg


Magnentius
A.D. 350-3
21x24mm   5.3g
[D N MAGNENTIVS P F AVG]; bare-headed, draped & cuirassed bust right
SALVS DD NN AVG ET CAES surrounding wreath enclosing large Chi-Rho flanked by A-W.
In ex. [LPAR]
RIC VIII Arles 201/202
#8
General Discussion / Re: Ridiculous eBay listing of...
Last post by Victor - April 26, 2025, 01:42:29 PM
worn LRB's and assorted Roman junk


Ancient Collection Gold, Silver, Bronze Coins Rings Roman + European.jpg
#9
Late Roman Bronze coins / Easter egg ancient
Last post by Victor - April 25, 2025, 09:58:32 AM
I was going to post this on Easter weekend; but the forum was down.

This reverse of this coin is VOT easter egg XX  ;D

Con I Rome 232 3.7g.JPG

Constantine I
A.D. 321
Ӕ nummus 20mm 3.7g
CONSTA-NTINVS AVG; Laureate head right.
D N CONSTANTINI MAX AVG surrounding laurel wreath enclosing VOT XX.
In ex. RP
RIC VII Rome 232/ 237
#10
General Discussion / Re: down for the past weekend
Last post by Victor - April 25, 2025, 08:58:36 AM
Yes, sorry about that. I had the same issue once. Unfortunately, my webpage is 20 years old and I don't expect I will update it...but, who knows what might happen in the future.