Late Roman Bronze Coins

 [attachment id=0 msg=6571]

RIC VII Rome 209
38mm 33.53g

This coin just sold in Bucephalus' inaugral auction for $1939 (with fees). Not to me. It had a very low estimate and I was hoping it might be regarded as a cast and go cheap, but no such luck.

It appears to be genuine, with a thickish layer of clay/mineral deposits on the bust which may be hiding some nice detail. Presumably the hole goes all the way through (assuming it's genuine).

Yes, it might clean up nicely.

There are some cleaning scratches on the obverse. It could be a really hard work cleansing this medallion.... But I will no surprise if it appears on a major auction auction within few months.

I don't know if the hammer price a a reasonable one, doesn't it?

QuoteI don't know if the hammer price a a reasonable one, doesn't it?

It seems reasonable. Constantine's bronze medallions do sometimes sell for oddly low prices, but depending who bought it I also expect this may reappear soon in cleaned form, and would expect the price could at least double.

On a related note, I have this cast copy of a different medallion, RIC 279, in my collection, which is dated to Rome 326 AD same as the above one. I paid $103 for this back in 2007.

[attachment id=0 msg=6575]

You can see the filled holes on mine, and from this I was recently able to identify the original it was copied from, which is in the Florence Archeological Museum.

[attachment id=1 msg=6575]

What's interesting is that there have been two other cast copies of this Florence one (note same filled holes), that sold for way more money. I wonder if the buyers thought they were buying repaired originals rather than casts ?!

This one sold for $2407 in M&M 14 (2004), with the description noting the plugged holes.

[attachment id=2 msg=6575]

This one sold for a whopping EUR 5500 in Artemide's 12-16-2006 auction.

[attachment id=3 msg=6575]

In comparison this genuine gilt one sold for only $4800 in CNG's Triton VIII in 2005.

[attachment id=4 msg=6575]